Federal Court Overturns Crucial Section of Voting Rights Act
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act allows private citizens to sue or bring up complaints arguing they were discriminated against in voting
A federal appeals court on Monday issued a decision that threatens a foundational section of the Voting Rights Act, which allows private citizens to sue or bring up complaints arguing they were discriminated against in voting.
The ruling came from the 8th Circuit and can — and probably will — be appealed to the Supreme Court. The court ruled that only the federal government, and not individuals or activist groups, can sue under the Voting Rights Act.
The ruling originated from a legal dispute the Arkansas NAACP brought against the state's Board of Apportionment, claiming that a new redistricting plan would dilute "Black voting strength in violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act."
In 2022, a district judge ruled that such a claim could only be brought forward by the Attorney General of the United States. On Monday, the ruling was upheld in a 2-1 vote.
"Did Congress give private plaintiffs the ability to sue under § 2 of the Voting Rights Act?" the document reads. "Text and structure reveal that the answer is no, so we affirm the district court’s1 decision to dismiss."
Advocates for this provision in the Voting Rights Act have argued that allowing individuals to sue is a foundation of the law, and ruling it unconstitutional nearly 60 years after passage would gut the landmark civil rights law.
"This radical 8th Circuit decision would essentially gut the remaining nationwide protections of the #VotingRightsAct by preventing anyone other than DOJ from enforcing them," Wendy Weiser, vice president for democracy at the Brenna Center, wrote on social media. "This is deeply wrong, and it goes against decades of precedent and practice."
- 10 Years After Supreme Court Gutted Voting Rights, We See the Impact on Black Americans
- Supreme Court Weakens Clean Water Act in Landmark Decision
- Senate Democrats Announce Committee Vote on Supreme Court Ethics Reform
- Biden’s Supreme Court pick won’t change many votes, but she will change the court
- The Senate votes to advance the Respect for Marriage Act. What’s in it, and how would it protect same-sex marriage?
- Supreme Court Justices Have Voted Against Their Appointing Presidents
Author and attorney Elie Mystal pointed out on his X account that the Supreme Court will likely reverse the ruling.
“This decision is a devastating blow to the civil rights of every American, and the integrity of our nation’s electoral system," said Barry Jefferson, political action chair of the Arkansas State Conference of the NAACP. "The Arkansas State Conference NAACP condemns this ruling in the strongest terms and will explore all available options to ensure that the rights of all voters are fully protected.”
The Voting Rights Act keeps voters from being discriminated against based on race, and was introduced in 1965. The new ruling limits the act by limiting who use it to make court challenges on whether voting rights have been impeded.
- Border, Immigration Deal Not Happening This Week, Senators SayPolitics
- GOP Rep. Wants to Impeach Secretary of Defense After Secret Hospital StayPolitics
- Senate Ethics Panel Investigating Menendez, a Top Democrat SaysPolitics
- Congress Demands Accountability From Defense Secretary Over Delayed Hospitalization DisclosurePolitics
- Biden the Attack Dog: President Goes All in Fighting Like TrumpPolitics
- Vehicle Collides With White House Complex Gate, Secret Service InvestigatingPolitics
- Nikki Haley Hits Back at DeSantis PAC Claim Hillary Clinton Was Her ‘Inspiration’: ‘He’s Lying Because He’s Losing’Politics
- Nikki Haley Blasts Biden Over Defense Chief Austin’s HospitalizationPolitics
- Trump Co-Defendant Alleges Inappropriate Relationship Between Fulton County DA Fani Willis and ProsecutorPolitics
- Trump Asks Maine Court to Pause His 14th Amendment Appeal While Supreme Court Takes It UpPolitics
- Freedom Caucus Can’t Stomach Speaker Johnson’s ‘Bogus’ Spending DealPolitics
- Trump-Appointed Supreme Court Justice Don’t Owe Him ‘One Thing,’ Former DNC Chair Donna Brazile SaysPolitics