Justice Alito: Congress Has ‘No Authority’ to Regulate Supreme Court
'I think it is something we have all thought about,' Alito said of his fellow Supreme Court justices
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito said he believes Congress has no authority under the U.S. Constitution to regulate the Supreme Court.
“I know this is a controversial view, but I’m willing to say it, no provision in the Constitution gives them the authority to regulate the Supreme Court — period," Alito said in an interview with the Wall Street Journal's opinion section that published Friday.
“I don’t know that any of my colleagues have spoken about it publicly, so I don’t think I should say, but I think it is something we have all thought about,” he added.
The Democratic-led Senate Judiciary Committee voted this week to advance a Supreme Court ethics reform proposal. The bill would require the court to adopt a code of conduct for justices and implement procedures to accept and investigate complaints of judicial misconduct. It would also require the court to enact stricter rules for disclosures of gifts, travel and income from justices and law clerks, in addition to creating procedural rules requiring each party or impartial adviser to report any gifts, income or reimbursements given to justices.
ProPublica has reported that Alito accepted luxury travel on a private jet with hedge-fund billionaire Paul Singer, who has asked the court repeatedly to rule in his favor.
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., criticized Alito's comments on Friday.
- Conservative Attack on Government Regulation Reaches the Supreme Court
- Supreme Court Will Review Laws That Regulate Social Media
- Sen. Chris Murphy Blasts Justice Alito: ‘His Seat on the Supreme Court Only Exists’ Because of Congress
- A new Supreme Court era has already begun
- Justice Amy Coney Barrett on Supreme Court Scrutiny: ‘Enhancing Civics Education is Welcome’
- Justice Kagan Supports Ethics Code for Supreme Court
"What a surprise, guy who is supposed to enforce checks and balances thinks checks shouldn’t apply to him," she wrote. "Corruption and abuse of power must be stopped, no matter the source. In fact, the court should be *most* subject to scrutiny, bc it is unelected & life appointed."
- Congress Demands Accountability From Defense Secretary Over Delayed Hospitalization DisclosurePolitics
- Biden the Attack Dog: President Goes All in Fighting Like TrumpPolitics
- Vehicle Collides With White House Complex Gate, Secret Service InvestigatingPolitics
- Nikki Haley Hits Back at DeSantis PAC Claim Hillary Clinton Was Her ‘Inspiration’: ‘He’s Lying Because He’s Losing’Politics
- Nikki Haley Blasts Biden Over Defense Chief Austin’s HospitalizationPolitics
- Trump Co-Defendant Alleges Inappropriate Relationship Between Fulton County DA Fani Willis and ProsecutorPolitics
- Trump Asks Maine Court to Pause His 14th Amendment Appeal While Supreme Court Takes It UpPolitics
- Freedom Caucus Can’t Stomach Speaker Johnson’s ‘Bogus’ Spending DealPolitics
- Trump-Appointed Supreme Court Justice Don’t Owe Him ‘One Thing,’ Former DNC Chair Donna Brazile SaysPolitics
- CNN Interview Goes Off the Rails Over Missouri Official’s Promise to Boot Biden From State BallotPolitics
- Ray Epps Blames Fox News’ ‘Propaganda’ While Requesting Leniency in Jan. 6 Prison SentencePolitics
- Rudy Giuliani Asks Georgia Judge to Let His Defense Team Interview Co-Defendants Who Pleaded GuiltyPolitics