Genocide Case Against Israel Opens at The Hague With Blistering Condemnation of Gaza War
South African prosecutors made no mention of Hamas attacks
South Africa’s lawyers tore into Israel on Thursday morning in the International Court of Justice in The Hague, citing statements by Israeli leaders from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to hardliners in his cabinet, as well as video clips and descriptions of the Israeli assault on Gaza to bolster their claim that Israel has been conducting genocide against Palestinians in Gaza.
“Israel’s special genocidal intent is rooted in the belief that the enemy is not just the military wing of Hamas, or just Hamas generally, but is embedded in the fabric of life in Gaza,” said South Africa’s senior counsel, Adila Hassam as she stood before the 15-judge panel in a full courtroom.
Describing the destruction of Gaza and the killing of civilians, Hassam projected videos of the horrors of the war, without any mention of the Hamas-led terror attack that precipitated the current war.
“Nothing will stop the suffering without an order from this court,” Hassam said.
“Genocides are never declared in advance. but this court has the benefit of the last 13 weeks of evidence,” which she said justified “a plausible claim of genocidal acts.”
A second South African attorney, Tembeka Ngcukaitobi, focused on comments from Israeli officials that he argued supported the claim that Israel’s actions in Gaza constituted genocide
“Israel’s special genocidal intent is rooted in the belief that the enemy is not just the military wing of Hamas or just Hamas generally, but is embedded in the fabric of life in Gaza,” he said..
He cited a comment by Netanyahu in a speech on October 28, when he told Israelis, “You must remember what Amalek did to you.”
- Israel Opens Defense Against Genocide Charge at International Court in The Hague
- Israel Slams South Africa for Acting as ‘Hamas’ Lawyer’ at Hague Trial
- South Africa Argued the Wrong Case Against Israel in The Hague
- South Africa’s Genocide Case Against Israel: What to Expect as Hearings Begin at The Hague
- South Africa Launches Genocide Case Against Israel in United Nations Court
- Jeremy Corbyn Tapped by South Africa to Prosecute Genocide Case Against Israel
In the Hebrew Bible, the Amalekites attacked the Israelites as they fled Egypt, and the Bible later calls for killing the entire nation of Amalek, as well as its animals, “Spare no one, but kill alike men and women, infants and sucklings, oxen and sheep, camels and asses!”
Apparently concerned that his remarks, and his earlier failure to condemn similar remarks by right-wing cabinet members and some military officers, Netanyahu said on Wednesday saying Israel had no intention of removing the Palestinian people from Gaza.
Netanyahu issued a video statement on the eve of the trial defending his country's actions.
“Israel has no intention of permanently occupying Gaza or displacing its civilian population,” he said. “Israel is fighting Hamas terrorists, not the Palestinian population, and we are doing so in full compliance with international law.”
The 1948 United Nations Convention on Genocide, the first human rights treaty adopted by the U.N. General Assembly, defines genocide as “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group.”
Both South Africa and Israel are signatories to the U.N. convention, which was largely a response to the Nazi genocide of the Jews in World War II.
Israeli lawyers are likely to note repeated statements by the country's leaders and commanders that its war is aimed only at destroying Hamas, and the fact that several Israeli officials have said recently that they have no interest in removing Palestinians from Gaza, while noting that Hamas fighters hide among civilians and fire their rockets from homes and schools.
The ICJ, a body that is often confused with the International Criminal Court, its neighbor in the Dutch city of The Hague, handles disputes between states and gives advisory opinions on international legal issues.
It could take years for the court to give a final ruling, but South Africa wants an immediate injunction against Israel to end the war. While the court has no police of its own to enforce the ruling, member states are obliged to respect the ruling, and Israel said in a cable to its embassies that a ceasefire order could have “practical bilateral, multilateral, economic, security ramifications.”
- Lost Blue Penguin Waddles onto Airport Runway, Causing Delays Before RescueNews
- Georgia Toddler Dies After Mother Kept Children in Freezing Woods Overnight, Police SayNews
- Russian Court Sentences Woman to 27 Years for Cafe Bombing that Killed Pro-War BloggerNews
- Miserable-At-Sea TikTok Cruiser Is Back on Dry LandNews
- Wisconsin Woman Slipped on Ice, Fell and Hit Her Head on a Fence. Someone Stepped Over Her As She Froze to Death at a Bus StopNews
- WATCH: ‘Successful’ Killer Whale Mom Lead Pod of 4, Including a Baby, Show off for California Boat TouristsNews
- 10- and 11-Year-Old Girls Accused of Threatening to Shoot Up Schools in South Carolina on Same DayNews
- Iran Was Warned by U.S. About ISIS Attack That Killed 84: ReportNews
- Israel Says Hamas May Have Shelled UN RefugeNews
- Meta Tightens Rules to Protect Teens on Instagram and FacebookTech
- Abortion Ordeal Prompts Tennessee Woman’s Bid For State OfficeNews
- DJ Gets Jail Stint for Urinating on Cancer Patient’s Backside in Social Club’s BathroomNews