Abortion advocates hope that the pills — which are safe, reliable and approved by the Food and Drug Administration — could allow people in states that ban abortion to get easier access to reproductive care after clinics close. The FDA late last year relaxed restrictions on how the drugs can be prescribed and delivered, meaning that, in theory, medication abortion can be accomplished with just a telehealth visit and a trip to the mailbox.
- Is abortion legal? What the Supreme Court overturning of Roe v. Wade means
- A new legal battle post-Roe: Can states ban FDA-approved abortion pills?
- How Wisconsin’s upcoming Supreme Court election became a referendum on abortion access
- The Abortion Pill Fight Heads Back to Court – What You Need to Know
- The Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade: Here’s what happens in countries that restrict abortion
Yet in practice, the pills are unlikely to be a panacea in a post-Roe United States. They will undoubtedly help some people in states where abortion is banned. But anti-abortion lawmakers are pushing hard to limit access to the drugs, enacting laws in 19 states that range from requiring mandatory ultrasounds and waiting periods to outright bans on telehealth. These already effectively bar the use of telemedicine to prescribe the drugs in a significant chunk of the country.
“It may be a mitigation strategy … and will make self-managed abortions much safer in this environment where people are living under bans,” said Daniel Grossman, director of Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health at the University of California, San Francisco. “But it’s not a solution.”
The existing patchwork of laws has created a legal gray area for the practitioners, patients and anyone else involved in providing access to abortion pills — especially with states now attempting to criminalize such care.
“A lot of people, when they think about a pre-Roe world, they think about safety. They think about people hemorrhaging in back alleys and unscrupulous doctors. That’s not what the post-Roe world is going to be,” said Kristin Ford, vice president of communications and research at the advocacy group NARAL. “What we do have to worry about is not hemorrhaging, but handcuffs.”
The advent of “21st-century abortion”
Years before the world knew of covid-19, in 2011, the FDA prohibited abortion drugs from being administered without an in-person appointment with a provider. Access was further limited by laws in 32 states that stipulate that a medical doctor, rather than a nurse practitioner or other professional, administer the drugs.
The restrictions applied to abortion drugs over the years are unusual for most FDA-approved medications, and further efforts to regulate medication at the state level are likewise outside the norm, given that drug oversight rests with the federal government, said Alina Salganicoff, director of women’s health policy for the Kaiser Family Foundation.
“We see this in many cases where there is kind of an ‘abortion exceptionalism,’” Salganicoff said. “We don’t regulate other procedures in the way that we regulate abortion.”
These regulatory hurdles have created a lack of awareness and uptake in use of medication abortion in the 22 years it has been available in the United States. By comparison, in some European countries, medication abortions make up more than 90 percent of all abortions, said Elisa Wells, the co-founder and director of Plan C, an information resource on medication abortion.
“A lot of people don’t even know abortion pills exist. They think it’s going to a clinic and getting an abortion procedure,” Wells said, adding that her organization hopes to bring awareness to the option of a “21st-century abortion,” with pills and telemedicine.
States take aim at abortion drugs
“Patients really like doing an abortion this way,” said Leah Coplon, the organization’s director of clinical operations. “It’s very private. They don’t have to travel to a clinic or take time off work or find child care.”
That convenience has sparked a backlash. “The opposition can see the handwriting on the wall,” said Kirsten Moore, director of the Expanding Medication Abortion Access Project. “They’re already moving to restrict access.”
Six states, including Texas and Indiana, have outright banned the use of telehealth for medication abortion, and many other states require ultrasounds, in-person counseling or other restrictions that effectively ban the practice. As a result, organizations like Abortion on Demand don’t provide services in these states for fear of litigation. If Roe is overturned, the situation will get even worse. “It will make an FDA-approved drug unavailable in states likely to make abortion illegal,” said Moore. “That’s never happened before.”
“People are taking on a legal risk to get an FDA-approved drug,” Moore said. Texas forbids mailing the pills within the state, but policing people’s mailboxes will be difficult. “It’s not a thing you can shut down,” she said.
Not convenient for all
According to Salganicoff, there’s not much comprehensive research on how many insurance plans exclude coverage of medical abortions. As a result, many people are in the dark about what a medical abortion may cost them, just as is the case with much healthcare.
“You don’t know you don’t have the coverage until the plan tells you you’re not covered,” Salganicoff said.
“We don’t have equitable broadband access around the country,” said Kimi Chernoby, an emergency medicine physician and reproductive health lawyer in Alexandria, Virginia. About 19 million Americans still lack access to broadband internet — including 1 in 4 in rural areas, many of which fall within states likely to make abortion illegal. For such people, brick-and-mortar clinics remain their only way to access care, and post-Roe, many will have to travel far to reach them.
“The reality is the barriers to access right now are the fact that most people are seeking abortion care on low income,” Moore said. “They are parents who are already struggling to make ends meet. So making them jump through extra hoops and spend more time trying to raise the funds to cover the cost of a very time-sensitive medical emergency like an abortion is just unnecessarily cruel.”
By early July, the Supreme Court is likely to end the national right to abortion after nearly a half-century.
Medication abortion will become more important, but “medication abortion is not the answer to Roe being overturned,” Coplon said. “We 100 percent still need our brick-and-mortar clinics. There will always be people who need care later in pregnancy or have medical reasons for not wanting medication abortions.”
You are now signed up for our newsletter.
- What Ramadan really means to me — and nearly 2 billion MuslimsGrid
- France protests, explained in five words: ‘Life begins when work ends’Grid
- Medical residents nationwide are unionizing. What does that mean for the future of healthcare?Grid
- Ramadan fashion hits the runways. Muslim women say it’s been a long time coming.Grid
- Who is Shou Zi Chew – the TikTok CEO doing all he can to keep his app going in the U.S.?Grid
- The SVB collapse has made deposits more valuable than ever — and banks will have to compete for themGrid
- Ukraine War in Data: 74,500 war crimes cases — and countingGrid
- Can China really play a role in ending the war in Ukraine?Grid
- ‘No Dumb Questions’: What is Section 230?Grid
- Trump steers allies and opponents on the right to a new enemy: Manhattan District Attorney Alvin BraggGrid
- World in Photos: In France, no-confidence vote and fresh protestsGrid
- Bad Takes, Episode 32: The lesson elites should have learned from IraqGrid